Charles W. Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
Charles W. Smith |
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
5:2022cv01684 |
September 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (not held) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS TO DISMISS #15 before Judge David O. Carter: The case is called. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #15 without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Deborah Parker. (jp) |
Filing 20 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter re: MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , #15 Motion hearing is ADVANCED to 11/7/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4, filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4, filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation to Dismiss Defendant Rimkus Consulting Group Inc., Purusant to FRCP #16 . Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. filed by Defendant Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gruen, Lisa) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 11/14/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of N. Boos, #2 Proposed Order) (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company answer now due 10/17/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.(Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: See L.R. 8-3 Response to Initial Complaint for format. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. answer now due 10/14/2022, filed by Defendant Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc..(Attorney Lisa P. Gruen added to party Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gruen, Lisa) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 11/7/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kdu) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, identifying Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 . The following error(s) was found: Missing page 1 of your NOTICE of Interested Parties. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge David O. Carter. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01684 DOC (SHKx). (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Charles W. Smith. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/20/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, identifying Liberty Mutual Group Inc.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California Superior Court, Riverside County, case number CVRI2203524 Receipt No: ACACDC-34050048 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Other State Court Documents (Civil Case Cover Sheet, Notice of Assignment, Notice of Case Management Conference), #4 Declaration of N. Boos) (Attorney Nicholas J. Boos added to party Liberty Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Boos, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.