Rachel Clark et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
| Rachel Clark and Greg Blankenbaker |
| Jayco, Inc., Richardson R.V. Centers, Inc. and Richardsons R.V. Centers, Inc. |
| 5:2022cv01703 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 DISCLOSURE of Certificate of Interesdted Persons filed by Defendant Jayco, Inc. (Baker, William) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Jayco, Inc..(Attorney William Louis Baker added to party Jayco, Inc.(pty:dft))(Baker, William) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 12/16/2022 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge John W. Holcomb. (eva)
|
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Richardsons R.V. Centers, Inc. (Baker, William) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Richardsons R.V. Centers, Inc..(Attorney William Louis Baker added to party Richardsons R.V. Centers, Inc. (pty:dft))(Baker, William) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:21-cv-00725 JWH(KKx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo and Judge George H. Wu to Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:22-cv-01703 JWH(KKx). Signed by Judge John W. Holcomb (rn)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Jayco, Inc., Richardsons R.V. Centers, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Richardsons R.V. Centers, Inc.) (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Greg Blankenbaker, Rachel Clark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Dalton, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Greg Blankenbaker, Rachel Clark, identifying Jayco, Inc. and Richardson's R.V. Centers, Inc.. (Dalton, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Greg Blankenbaker, Rachel Clark. (Dalton, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34068384 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Rachel Clark, Greg Blankenbaker. (Attorney Richard C Dalton added to party Greg Blankenbaker(pty:pla), Attorney Richard C Dalton added to party Rachel Clark(pty:pla))(Dalton, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
