Miguel Soto v. Carlos A. Salazar
Plaintiff: Miguel Soto
Defendant: Carlos A. Salazar, Does 1 to 10 and KEITH HILLEN
Case Number: 5:2022cv01821
Filed: October 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Referring Judge: Sunshine Suzanne Sykes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Miguel Soto pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Carlos A. Salazar. (Kim, Jason)
November 7, 2022 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint, #10 as to Defendants KEITH HILLEN, Carlos A. Salazar. (shb)
November 4, 2022 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #10 filed by Plaintiff Miguel Soto. (Kim, Jason)
November 4, 2022 Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant KEITH HILLEN amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Miguel Soto(Kim, Jason)
October 18, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Carlos A. Salazar. (shb)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
October 17, 2022 Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Miguel Soto. (Kim, Jason)
October 14, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
October 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh)
October 14, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason)
October 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Miguel Soto. (Kim, Jason)
October 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34154874 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Miguel Soto(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miguel Soto v. Carlos A. Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel Soto
Represented By: Jason J Kim
Represented By: Jason T Yoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlos A. Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEITH HILLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?