Robert Gaxiola v. Ford Motor Company et al
Robert Gaxiola |
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2022cv01852 |
October 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Sheri Pym |
Hernan D Vera |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christopher Campbell counsel for Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. Adding Christopher Campbell as counsel of record for Robert Gaxiola for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. (Attorney Christopher Campbell added to party Robert Gaxiola(pty:pla))(Campbell, Christopher) |
Filing 27 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elizabeth A LaRocque counsel for Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. Adding Elizabeth A. LaRocque as counsel of record for Robert Gaxiola for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. (Attorney Elizabeth A LaRocque added to party Robert Gaxiola(pty:pla))(LaRocque, Elizabeth) |
Filing 26 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (cbr) |
Filing 25 REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera: Please refer to Order for complete details. (cbr) |
Filing 24 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#OCJ 23-062) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Hernan D. Vera, this case is transferred from Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha to the calendar of Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:22-cv-01852 HVD(SPx). (rn) |
Filing 23 ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, AND CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/22/2024 01:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 4/16/2024 08:30 AM; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 3/22/2024 at 01:00 PM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc) Modified on 1/30/2023 (lc). |
Filing 22 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 02/16/2024. (tf) |
Filing 21 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the February 10, 2023, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 20 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola.. (Harman-Holmes, Ariel) |
Filing 19 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On January 4, 2023, the court Ordered Plaintiffs to Show Cause ("OSC") why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Dkt. 17 ). On January 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Declaration of Ariel Harman-Holmes ("Declaration") in response to the OSC. (Dkt. #18 ). Having considered the Declaration, the court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and file an Amended Joint Rule 26(f) Report on or before January 27, 2023. The Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to February 10, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. The OSC is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 DECLARATION of Ariel Harman-Holmes re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,, 17 filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. (Harman-Holmes, Ariel) |
Filing 17 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court, on its own motion, ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than January 13, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. On November 23, 2022, the court ordered the parties to file a Joint Report pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) by December 30, 2022. (Dkt. #14 ). On December 30, 2022, Defendant Ford Motor Company filed a unilateral Rule 26(f) report stating that Defendant attempted to contact Plaintiff regarding the submission of a Joint Report, but Plaintiff did not respond. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the court. Plaintiff is advised that the court will consider the filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report, in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before January 13, 2023, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause may result in dismissal of the action without further notice. The Scheduling Conference is continued to January 27, 2023. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Report #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 15 RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 1/13/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Won, Jonathan) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Attorney Jonathan Won added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Won, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Robert Gaxiola, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, CT Corporation System, Inc., Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Dolin, Tionna) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 9 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola, (Dolin, Tionna) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ford Motor Company. (et) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. (Dolin, Tionna) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. (Dolin, Tionna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34187658 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Robert Gaxiola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Tionna Dolin added to party Robert Gaxiola(pty:pla))(Dolin, Tionna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.