Leslie Anne Scott et al v. Otis Elevator Company et al
Leslie Anne Scott and Anna Loraeen Joven |
Otis Elevator Company and Does 1 to 100, inclusive |
5:2022cv01916 |
October 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Steve Kim |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Notice OF FILING OF NOTICE TO STATE COURT AND ADVERSE PARTIES OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1332 filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Scheduling Conference set for 01/11/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/28/2022. (pg) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 12 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01916 SPG (SKx). (car) |
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel James Kelly counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Daniel J. Kelly as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Attorney Daniel James Kelly added to party Otis Elevator Company(pty:dft))(Kelly, Daniel) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Valeria Golodnitska counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Valeria Golodnitska as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Attorney Valeria Golodnitska added to party Otis Elevator Company(pty:dft))(Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company, re Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #6 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #5 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 served on October 28, 2022. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiffs Leslie Anne Scott, Anna Loraeen Joven, upon Defendant Otis Elevator Company served on 8/10/2022, answer due 8/31/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service by leaving with Daisy Montenegro, CT Corp. Intake Specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. Submitted with Attachment 5 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, Inclusive, Otis Elevator Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Leslie Anne Scott, Anna Loraeen Joven. Filed in State Court on 6/28/2022 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Vasudhsiri Torch Sathienmars counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Anthony D. Brosamle as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Vasudhsiri Torch Sathienmars counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Valeria Golodnitska as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Vasudhsiri Torch Sathienmars counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Daniel J. Kelly as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company, identifying Otis Worldwide Corporation. (Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior, case number CIVSB 2213496 Receipt No: ACACDC-34237315 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Complaint filed in state court, #3 Exhibit Otis Answer to Complaint filed in state court, #4 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Statement of Damages, #5 Exhibit Process and pleadings filed and served in state court) (Attorney Vasudhsiri Torch Sathienmars added to party Otis Elevator Company(pty:dft))(Sathienmars, Vasudhsiri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.