Ashley Boguett v. American Woodmark Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Ashley Boguett
Defendant: American Woodmark Corporation, RSI Home Products, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2022cv01983
Filed: November 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Sunshine Suzanne Sykes
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ashley Boguett, identifying American Woodmark Corporation and RSI Home Products, Inc.. (Mankin, Brian)
November 22, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Ashley Boguett. Dismissal is without. (Mankin, Brian)
November 15, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to RSI Home Products, Inc. answer now due 12/8/2022; American Woodmark Corporation answer now due 12/8/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant RSI Home Products, Inc.; American Woodmark Corporation.(Beldner, Sabrina)
November 14, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
November 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap)
November 10, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ashley Boguett, upon Defendant American Woodmark Corporation served on 10/11/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens, Client Representative, CSC Lawyers Incorporated, Registerd Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/14/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT H) (ghap)
November 10, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ashley Boguett, upon Defendant RSI Home Products, Inc. served on 10/11/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens, Client Service Representative-Authorized to Accept on behalf of Corporation Services Company which will do business in California as CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service- Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/14/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT G) (ghap)
November 10, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants American Woodmark Corporation, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, RSI Home Products, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Ashley Boguett. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/05/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
November 10, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant American Woodmark Corporation, RSI Home Products, Inc., (Beldner, Sabrina)
November 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants American Woodmark Corporation, RSI Home Products, Inc.. (Beldner, Sabrina)
November 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2204300 Receipt No: ACACDC-34305275 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant RSI Home Products, Inc., American Woodmark Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Case Management Conference, #5 Certificate of Counsel, #6 Notice of Department Assignment, #7 Proof of Service of Summons, #8 Proof of Service of Summons, #9 Class action Case Management Order 1) (Attorney Sabrina A Beldner added to party American Woodmark Corporation (pty:dft), Attorney Sabrina A Beldner added to party RSI Home Products, Inc.(pty:dft))(Beldner, Sabrina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ashley Boguett v. American Woodmark Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Boguett
Represented By: Brian J Mankin
Represented By: Peter Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Woodmark Corporation
Represented By: Sabrina A Beldner
Represented By: Andrew W Russell
Represented By: Natalie Michelle Lagunas
Represented By: Sarah Yoonhae Oh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RSI Home Products, Inc.
Represented By: Sabrina A Beldner
Represented By: Natalie Michelle Lagunas
Represented By: Andrew W Russell
Represented By: Sarah Yoonhae Oh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?