Summer Whiteside v. Kimberly Clark Corp.
| Summer Whiteside |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp. and Kimberly Clark Corp. |
| 5:2022cv01988 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
AMENDED ORDER (Amending Dkt. No. 13) Granting Stipulation to File Amended Complaint and Extend Time to Respond to the Operative Complaint By Not More Than 30 Days (L.R. 8-3) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal #13 . Defendant shall have until January 30, 2023 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint or First Amended Complaint; and 2. On or before December 16, 2022, Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint to only include a request for damages pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code 1782(d) without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to subsequently amend as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 15(a)(1) and with Defendants agreement that it will not oppose a reasonable request to further amend the complaint in response to Defendants anticipated Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) motion. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Joint Stipulation Extending Time to Answer Initial Complaint by Not More Than 30 Days (L.R. 8-3), (30 days or less), #11 . Defendant Kimberly Clark Corp. answer due 1/9/2023. (twdb)
|
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Kimberly Clark Corp. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Summer Whiteside (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Bruce, Katherine) |
| Filing 11 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kimberly Clark Corp. answer now due 1/30/2023, filed by Defendant Kimberly Clark Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Attorney Timothy William Loose added to party Kimberly Clark Corp.(pty:dft))(Loose, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Summer Whiteside, upon Defendant Kimberly Clark Corp. served on 11/17/2022, answer due 12/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kimberly Clark Corp.. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Summer Whiteside. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Summer Whiteside, (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Summer Whiteside. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34308322 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Summer Whiteside. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Ryan J Clarkson added to party Summer Whiteside(pty:pla))(Clarkson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
