Megan Reeves v. Riverside County Sheriffs Department et al
| Megan Reeves |
| Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Banning Police Department, Beaumont Police Department, City of Banning, City of Beaumont and Deputy John Does |
| 5:2022cv02021 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER RE: CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Clerk of Court is directed to CONSOLIDATE the actions under Rule 42(a)(2). Moving forward, the single action will be denominated as Reeves v. City of Palm Springs, et al., ED CV 22-1910 SB (MRW). (see document for further details). Case associated with Lead Case 5:22-1910. (hr)
|
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Adrian Michael Paris counsel for Defendant City of Banning. Adding Adrian M. Paris as counsel of record for City of Banning for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant City of Banning. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Adrian Michael Paris added to party City of Banning(pty:dft))(Paris, Adrian) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of Banning. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Dean, Mitchell) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mitchell Dean counsel for Defendant City of Banning. Adding Mitchell D. Dean as counsel of record for Defendant for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant City of Banning. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Mitchell Dean added to party City of Banning(pty:dft))(Dean, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYING A FILING FEE #2 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. On November 22, the Court requested more information about Plaintiff's finances in order to rule on her applications. Plaintiff submitted a supplemental declaration in both actions, and the Court now finds that the applications make an adequate showing of indigency. Thus, the Court grants Plaintiff's applications to proceed in both cases without paying filing fees. (lom)
|
| Filing 5 DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff Megan Reeves. (gk) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYING FEES by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff Megan Reeves filed two cases against police and localities arising from the death of her domestic partner. In both cases, she filed applications to proceed without paying a filing fee #2 . The applications are contradictory and the Court would benefit from further information about Plaintiff's finances in order to rule on the applications. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to submit a supplemental declaration no later than 12/7/2022. Failure to so file may result in denial of the applications. If the Court grants Plaintiff's applications, it intends to consolidate these actions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. (gk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Megan Reeves. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Banning Police Department, Beaumont Police Department, City of Banning, City of Beaumont, John Does (1-8, individual capacites), John Does (1-8, official capacities), Riverside County Sheriffs Department Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner., filed by Plaintiff Megan Reeves. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request for Defendant City of Beaumont, #3 Summons for City of Banning, #4 Summons for Riverside County Sherriffs and Banning Police Deparment) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
