Hazel Figueroa v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. et al
Hazel Figueroa |
CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive |
5:2022cv02051 |
November 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc... (Carrillo, Christopher) |
DOCUMENT deleted - CV-92 Notice of Blackout entered on 11/18/2022 - for the following reason: Issued in error. (lro) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-02051 SPG (SPx). (jtil) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the Notice of Assignment at docket entry no. #6 was incorrectly filed and has been replaced by the Notice of Assignment of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice Re Consent to proceed. (jtil) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher Michael Carrillo on behalf of Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. (Carrillo, Christopher) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 (SEE NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR #12 ) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) Modified on 11/28/2022 (jtil). |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 served on November 18, 2022. (Carrillo, Christopher) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. in Riverside Superior Court on 11/16/2022, attached as Exhibit 4.(jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Hazel Figueroa in Riverside Superior Court on 7/27/2022, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc., (Carrillo, Christopher) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. (Carrillo, Christopher) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.. (Carrillo, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2203119 Receipt No: ACACDC-34345761 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Conor Dale, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt & Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 - Signed Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt, #5 Exhibit 4 - Answer, #6 Declaration of Charissa Sebesta, #7 Exhibit A - New Employee Data Form) (Attorney Christopher Michael Carrillo added to party CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.(pty:dft))(Carrillo, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.