LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr v. James Hill et al
Plaintiff: LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr
Defendant: James Hill, R. Roble, V. Vasques, C. Guthrie, C. Parker and J. Castillo
Case Number: 5:2022cv02072
Filed: November 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) SCREENING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. For all these reasons, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing by February 17, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed-in whole or in part-based on the factual and legal deficiencies outlined above. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Voluntary Dismissal Form) (clee)
January 9, 2023 Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $10.00 subsequent payment from plaintiff LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr on 01/09/2023, receipt number LA248669, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P),, #6 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dl)
January 4, 2023 Filing 8 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $.70 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr on 01/04/2023, receipt number LA248374, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P),, #6 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (jo)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (clee)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE) #2 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On the question of indigency, the Court finds that Plaintiff is not able to prepay the full filing fee. The Request is GRANTED. Plaintiff now owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of 21.33 due immediately; this case may be dismissed if that amount is not received by the Court within 30 days.Thereafter, monthly payments must be forwarded to the Court.. (lc)
December 19, 2022 Filing 5 CDCR TRUST STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr (hr)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: POSTPONED for 30 days so that Plaintiff has the opportunity to provide: The missing information identified above re: #2 Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support. (es)
November 23, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
November 21, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr. (car)
November 21, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, filed by Plaintiff LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr v. James Hill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Roble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: V. Vasques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Guthrie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?