CrossFit, LLC v. Angel Rodriguez
| CrossFit, LLC |
| Angel Rodriguez |
| 5:2022cv02078 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (rolm) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Rodriguez is bound by the Injunction regardless of whether CrossFit, LLCassigns or licenses its intellectual property rights to another for so long as such trademark rights are subsisting, valid, and enforceable. The Injunction inures to the benefit of CrossFit, LLCs successors, assignees, and licensees. The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including without limitation the Injunction. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Judgment as to All Claim Against Defendant Angel Rodriguez, STIPULATION for Permanent Injunction as to Defendant Angel Rodriguez filed by Plaintiff CrossFit, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Amato, Yuo-Fong) |
|
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Angel Rodriguez. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by CrossFit, LLC. (Amato, Yuo-Fong) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CrossFit, LLC, identifying CrossFit, LLC. (Amato, Yuo-Fong) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff CrossFit, LLC. (Amato, Yuo-Fong) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff CrossFit, LLC. (Amato, Yuo-Fong) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34368536 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff CrossFit, LLC. (Attorney Yuo-Fong Chang Amato added to party CrossFit, LLC(pty:pla))(Amato, Yuo-Fong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CrossFit, LLC v. Angel Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CrossFit, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Yuo-Fong Chang Amato |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Angel Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
