Kathleen Rust v. Kingston Date & Credit International, Inc.
| Kathleen Rust |
| Kingston Date & Credit International, Inc., Kingston Date and Credit International, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv02093 |
| November 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT, REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD, AND FILING OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On 1/19/2023, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement (Doc. #12 ), indicating that the case has fully settled. Based thereon, the Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed and that this action is removed from the Court's active caseload. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal no later than 3/20/2023. Until the Dismissal Date, the Court retains full jurisdiction over this action. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Kathleen Rust. (Friedman, Todd) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. A Scheduling Conference is set for Friday. March 3, 2023 at 10:30 AM. See attached Order for details. (hc)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kingston Date and Credit International, Inc. answer now due 1/19/2023, re Amended Complaint/Petition #8 filed by Defendant Kingston Date and Credit International, Inc..(McElroy, Jessica) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Kathleen Rust(Wheeler, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Kingston Date and Credit International, Inc..(McElroy, Jessica) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Josephine L. Staton. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-02093 JLS (JPRx). (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kathleen Rust in Riverside Superior Court on 10/24/2022, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Kingston Date & Credit International, Inc. (McElroy, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kingston Date & Credit International, Inc., (McElroy, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVPS2204151 Receipt No: ACACDC-34378241 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Kingston Date & Credit International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Jessica A McElroy added to party Kingston Date & Credit International, Inc.(pty:dft))(McElroy, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
