Manuel Martinez et al v. County of Riverside et al
| Manuel Martinez and Manuela Garcia Martinez |
| County of Riverside and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv02144 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 2/27/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (npo)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of case from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:22-cv-02144-JGB(SHKx). (ap) |
| Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants County of Riverside. (Andersen, Kayleigh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due Case was opened in CM/ECF System by counsel and provisionally assigned to a division of this Court. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for all further proceedings. New Case Number 5:22-cv-02144-SP. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial filed by Defendant County of Riverside. [FILED IN STATE COURT 11/23/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT C TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Riverside, Does 1-10 amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiffs Manuel Martinez, Manuela Garcia Martinez. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 #1 ] (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Riverside, Does 1 to 10. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Manuel Martinez, Manuela Garcia Martinez. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/4/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant County of Riverside, Of Notice To Adverse Party Of Removal To Federal Court served on November 30, 2022. (Andersen, Kayleigh) |
| Filing 3 Certification of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Riverside, identifying Manuel MartinezPlaintiff Manuela MartinezPlaintiff County of RiversidePublic Entity Defendant. (Attorney Kayleigh Ann Andersen added to party County of Riverside(pty:dft))(Andersen, Kayleigh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant County of Riverside. (Andersen, Kayleigh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVPS2200900 Receipt No: ACACDC-34401343 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant County of Riverside. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons Complaint, #2 Exhibit B FAC, #3 Exhibit C Answer to FAC) (Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party County of Riverside(pty:dft))(Ramirez, Eugene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
