Ashish Acharjee v. Sheriff Department of Riverside County et al
| Ashish Acharjee |
| Sheriff Department of Riverside County, Remington, Office of District Attorney of Riverside County and Michael Hestrin |
| 5:2023cv00112 |
| January 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE ON STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICER Executed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee, upon Defendant Michael Hestrin ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Office of District Attorney of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Remington ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Sheriff Department of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (et) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE ON STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICER Executed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee, upon Defendant Michael Hestrin ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Office of District Attorney of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Remington ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Sheriff Department of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (et) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE ON STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICER Executed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee, upon Defendants Sheriff Department of Riverside County, ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) Office of District Attorney of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (et) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE ON STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICER Executed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee, upon Defendant Michael Hestrin ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Office of District Attorney of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Remington ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Sheriff Department of Riverside County ( NAME OF SPECIFIC DEFENDANT CITED ON PAGE 2, LEFT BLANK) served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (et) |
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) MINUTE ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: The Court has determined that service is appropriate. Under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff must accomplish service of the summons and Complaint on each named Defendant within ninety (90) days after filing of the Complaint. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (es)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. See document for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis because the filer has the ability to pay. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must pay the full filing fee of $402. If the filer does not comply with these instructions within 30 days, this case will be DISMISSED without prejudice. (gk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ashish Acharjee against Defendants Michael Hestrin, Office of District Attorney of Riverside County, Remington, Sheriff Department of Riverside County Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (Attachments: #1 CV71) #2 Summons Request) (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
