Shelby Cooper et al v. Mars, Inc.
Shelby Cooper and Samantha Horton |
Mars, Inc. |
5:2023cv00135 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Shelby Cooper, Samantha Horton. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Apton, Adam) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Courtney E. Maccarone on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Mark S. Reich on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mars, Inc. (et) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Shelby Cooper, Samantha Horton. (Apton, Adam) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Adam M. Apton PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 1780(d) filed by Plaintiffs Shelby Cooper, Samantha Horton. (Apton, Adam) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Shelby Cooper, Samantha Horton, (Apton, Adam) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Shelby Cooper, Samantha Horton. (Apton, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34680918 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Shelby Cooper, Samantha Horton. (Attorney Adam Marc Apton added to party Shelby Cooper(pty:pla), Attorney Adam Marc Apton added to party Samantha Horton(pty:pla))(Apton, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.