Nelson H. Romero v. San Bernardino County et al
| Nelson H. Romero |
| San Bernardino County, Police Officer G. Miles and West Valley Detention Center |
| 5:2023cv00142 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Request is DENIED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (iv)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Nelson H. Romero. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nelson H. Romero. (et) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants G. Miles (official capacity), G. Miles (individual), San Bernardino County, West Valley Detention Center Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson., filed by Plaintiff Nelson H. Romero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
