David W. Marshall et al v. County of Riverside et al
| David W. Marshall and Julie C. Marshall |
| County of Riverside, Jessica Chip Hernandez, Daniela Valdez, Silvia Ivanova, Odalys Beltran, Does 1- 10 Inclusive, Does 1-7 Inclusive and Celeste Toro |
| 5:2023cv00158 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Forms is not filled out. Document is incomplete except for Plaintiffs' signature.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Civil Cover Sheet [ #5 -3]. The following error(s) was/were found: Forms is not filled out. Document is incomplete except for Plaintiffs' signature.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (et) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David W. Marshall. (et) |
Filing 6
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (clee)
|
| Filing 5 CORRECTED COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Odalys Beltran, County of Riverside, Does, Jessica Chip Hernandez, Silvia Ivanova, Daniela Valdez, Celeste Toro, filed by Plaintiffs David W. Marshall, Julie C. Marshall, re: Complaint #1 . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71))(hr) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Complaint #1 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #3 by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiffs are ordered to correct the deficiency by filing a signed version of their complaint as soon as possible, but no later than February 15, 2023. (hr) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document lacks required signature. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Odalys Beltran, County of Riverside, Does, Jessica Chip Hernandez, Silvia Ivanova, Daniela Valdez Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim.(Filing fee$402 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiffs Julie C. Marshall, David W. Marshall. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
