Universal Shipping, Inc. et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas
UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC. and AKBAR AFZAL JESSANI |
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas |
5:2023cv00167 |
January 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Mark C Scarsi |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:23-cv-00167 MCS(ASx). (rn) |
Filing 10 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (Molina, Vanessa) |
Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (dc) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vanessa Molina on behalf of Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas (Attorney Vanessa Molina added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft))(Molina, Vanessa) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Universal Shipping, Inc., Akbar Afzal Jessani, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 2/9/2023, answer due 4/10/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Ealy Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown Individual. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proof of Service on Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Supplement Proof of Service on U.S. Attorney General)(Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs AKBAR AFZAL JESSANI, UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC.. (Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs AKBAR AFZAL JESSANI, UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC., (Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs AKBAR AFZAL JESSANI, UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC.. (Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34717466 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC., AKBAR AFZAL JESSANI. (Attorney Jonathan Roger Sturman added to party AKBAR AFZAL JESSANI(pty:pla), Attorney Jonathan Roger Sturman added to party UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC.(pty:pla))(Sturman, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.