Griselda Garcia v. Perfect 10 Antenna Company et al
Plaintiff: Griselda Garcia
Defendant: Perfect 10 Antenna Company, PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive and PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. doing business as Perfect 10 Antenna Company
Case Number: 5:2023cv00318
Filed: February 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report (Docket No. 14) and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the parties. As per C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15, the April 17, 2023 scheduling conference date is taken off calendar. This action raises claims of disability discrimination, failme to reasonably accommodate, retaliation. The Court sets the following dates: (see document for further details) (bm)
April 10, 2023 Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-10, filed by Defendant PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc... (Soares, George)
March 3, 2023 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #11 (Soares, George)
March 3, 2023 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc..(Soares, George)
March 2, 2023 Filing 13 **AMENDED** MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for April 17, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than April 10, 2023. See Local Rule 26-1. RE: MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, #10 . (aco)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for April 17, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than March 10, 2023. See Local Rule 26-1. (lom)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
February 28, 2023 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
February 28, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
February 28, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge George H. Wu. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-0318 GW (KKx). (sh)
February 24, 2023 NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Griselda Garcia, upon Defendant Perfect 10 Antenna Company served on 2/28/2023 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT 5 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
February 24, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Griselda Garcia.[FILED IN STATE COURT 09/29/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
February 24, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Perfect 10 Antenna Company, PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc., identifying Griselda Garcia; PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. dba Perfect 10 Antenna Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Soares, George)
February 24, 2023 Filing 4 Notice OF RELATED CASES filed by Defendant Perfect 10 Antenna Company, PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Soares, George)
February 24, 2023 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Perfect 10 Antenna Company, PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Soares, George)
February 24, 2023 Filing 2 DECLARATION of Darwin Davidson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Perfect 10 Antenna Company, PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Soares, George)
February 24, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVSB 2221561 Receipt No: ACACDC-34856085 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc., Perfect 10 Antenna Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-6 to Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Service) (Attorney George P Soares added to party Perfect 10 Antenna Company(pty:dft), Attorney George P Soares added to party PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc.(pty:dft))(Soares, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griselda Garcia v. Perfect 10 Antenna Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Griselda Garcia
Represented By: Shant Armen Kotchounian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perfect 10 Antenna Company
Represented By: George P Soares
Represented By: Roger M Mansukhani
Represented By: Trenten Bilodeaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc.
Represented By: George P Soares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. doing business as Perfect 10 Antenna Company
Represented By: Roger M Mansukhani
Represented By: Trenten Bilodeaux
Represented By: George P Soares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?