Janis Lucille Hilke v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
Janis Lucille Hilke |
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and DOES 1-20, inclusive |
5:2023cv00340 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 7/17/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (tc) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #10 served on 03/22/2023. (James, Jason) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:23-cv-00340-JGB (KKx). (et) |
Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (James, Jason) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, re Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #6 served on 03/06/2023. (James, Jason) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV-11) (lh) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Declaration #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on March 1, 2023. (James, Jason) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, filed by Plaintiff Janis Lucille Hilke. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/13/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Sandra Wilson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (James, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, identifying The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Prudential Financial, Inc. (James, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (James, Jason) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2210071 Receipt No: ACACDC-34875562 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 State Issued Summons, #2 Plaintiff's State Complaint, #3 State Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 State Certificate of Assignment, #5 Prudential's Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Jason A James added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(James, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.