Adriana Berenice Ramos v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| ADRIANA B RAMOS and Adriana Berenice Ramos |
| UR M JADDOU, JOSEPH M HACKBARTH, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Ur M. Jaddou and Joseph M. Hackbarth |
| 5:2023cv00345 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Application for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Adriana Berenice Ramos. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:23-cv-00345 SSS(KKx). (rn) |
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #9 . The deadline for Defendant to file his response to the Complaint is continued to June 19, 2023. (dc)
|
| Filing 9 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 19, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Federal Defendants Joseph M. Hackbarth, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bashyrov, Jacob) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney on behalf of Defendants Joseph M. Hackbarth, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. Assistant United States Attorney OIL-DCS Trial Attorney terminated. (Attorney Jacob Bashyrov added to party Joseph M. Hackbarth(pty:dft), Attorney Jacob Bashyrov added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Jacob Bashyrov added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft))(Bashyrov, Jacob) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adriana Berenice Ramos, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Joseph M. Hackbarth, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff ADRIANA B RAMOS. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ADRIANA B RAMOS, identifying none. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ADRIANA B RAMOS. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34877032 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff ADRIANA B RAMOS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Jennifer Rozdzielski added to party ADRIANA B RAMOS(pty:pla))(Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
