Alonna Harris v. Fedex Group Package System, Inc. et al
Alonna Harris |
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., Robert Burns, Juan Doe, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Fedex Group Package System, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2023cv00351 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Receipt of remand letter from Superior Court of San Bernardino (twdb) |
Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of San Bernardino. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of San Bernardino. (shb) |
|
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff Alonna Harris. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sadat, Arash) |
|
Filing 9 This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Sunshine S. Sykes, United States District Judge. Judge Sykes is located in Courtroom 2, on the 2nd Floor of the George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501. Additional information regarding Judge Sykes procedures and schedules is available on the Court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:23-cv-00351 SSS(SPx). (rn) |
Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Fedex Group Package System, Inc.. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Fedex Group Package System, Inc., attached as Exhibit 3. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT, filed by Plaintiff Alonna Harris in San Bernardino Superior Court on 9/26/2022, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. Related Case(s): None (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. identifying Fedex Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., identifying Plaintiff Alonna Harris; Mills Sadat Dowlat LLP, counsel for Plaintiff; Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.; Fisher & Phillips LLP, counsel for Defendant. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2221100 Receipt No: ACACDC-34881170 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Eugene Banks ISO Defendant's Removal, #2 Complaint) (Attorney Shaun J Voigt added to party FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. (pty:dft))(Voigt, Shaun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.