Sebren Abbalum Pierce v. Luis Martinez
Sebren Abbalum Pierce |
Luis Martinez |
5:2023cv00393 |
March 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Stephen V Wilson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. [Document will be mailed to the Supreme Court. ](mat) |
Filing 17 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: denying #15 MOTION for Reconsideration #15 . The Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 15) is DENIED. Further, other than a Notice of Appeal or filings relating thereto, no further filings shall be permitted in this closed case without prior authorization from the Court or the Ninth Circuit, and attempts to file unauthorized, non-appellate filings are subject to being summarily stricken. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 16 OBJECTION filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (mba) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Reconsideration re Judgment #11 filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (hr) |
Filing 14 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 into the registry of the Court from Desiree Smith FBO Sebren Abbalum Pierce. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number 33. (dve) |
Filing 13 Progress Report filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (mba) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: Order #10 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new action if he obtains permission from the Ninth Circuit to file a second or successive petition. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 10 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: denying as moot #4 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, this action be summarily dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new action in this Court if he obtains authorization from the Ninth Circuit to do so, with judgment to be entered accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance (Dkt. 4) is DENIED as moot. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, Denying Motions #6 , #7 , #8 . (mba) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Judicial Notice, Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 201, filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (mba) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Court Order Directing the Clerk of the Court to Make Corrections to the Court's Record, filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (mba) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance, filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (mba) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
Filing 2 Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition (CV-111). Upon submission of your petition for writ of habeas corpus, it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action may be dismissed. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . (ghap) |
Filing 4 MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE filed by petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (ghap) |
Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (ghap) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Sebren Abbalum Pierce. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sebren Abbalum Pierce v. Luis Martinez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Sebren Abbalum Pierce | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Luis Martinez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.