Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Moonlight Investments Inc. et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association |
| Moonlight Investments Inc., a New Mexico corporation (aka Moonlite Investments Inc., a New Mexico corporation), Moonlight Construction Inc., a California corporation (aka Moonlite Construction Inc., a California corporation), Peter Tsianis, Jonathan Celaya, Moonlight Investments Inc., Moonlight Construction Inc., Moonlite Investments Inc., Moonlite Construction Inc, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Pete Tsiamis |
| Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 5:2023cv00489 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Jonathan Celaya. (Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank N.A. is awarded judgment against Defendants Moonlight Construction Inc., aka Moonlite Construction Inc., Moonlight Investments Inc., dba Moonlite Investments Inc., Jonathan Celaya, Pete Tsiamis and is entitled to recover from defendants the sum of $155,366.07, plus post-judgment interest at 10 percent per annum. See document for further information. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment #15 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION for Judgment as to against defendants Moonlight Investments Inc. a/k/a Moonlite Investments Inc., Moonlight Construction Inc. a/k/a Moonlite Construction Inc., and Pete Tsiamis filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Judgment) re Stipulation for Entry of Judgment)(Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: USM-285 Service of S/C - (21 days) Executed #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) - under Category - Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints. (2) USM-285 Service of S/C - (21 days) event utilized in docketing this filing. Please use the SEARCH feature on the CM/ECF Menu Bar if you are unsure of the events to use. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 13 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 upon Moonlight Investments Inc. served on 4/28/2023, answer due 5/19/2023, served by Certified Mail service, by Federal statute, upon Moonlight Investments Inc. Remarks: Served per CCP section 415.40. (Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #10 as to Defendants Jonathan Celaya, Moonlight Construction Inc., Moonlight Investments Inc., Pete Tsiamis. (jp) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, #10 filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Moonlight Investments Inc., a New Mexico corporation (a/k/a Moonlite Investments Inc., a New Mexico corporation); Moonlight Construction Inc., a California corporation (a/k/a Moonlite Construction Inc., a California corporation; Pete Tsiamis, an individual; Jonathan Celaya, an individual Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (1-6) in Support of First Amended Complaint)(Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Jonathan Celaya, Moonlight Construction Inc., Moonlight Investments Inc., Peter Tsianis. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association. (Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association, identifying Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Wells Fargo & Co., publicly traded parent of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association. (Shulman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34997222 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit in support of Complaint) (Attorney Jeremy E. Shulman added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association (pty:pla))(Shulman, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
