Alberto Mora v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
Alberto Mora |
FedEx Freight, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
5:2023cv00493 |
March 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant FedEx Freight, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates))(Llaurado, Mireya) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FedEx Freight, Inc., served on 3/23/23. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to Adverse Party of Removal)(Llaurado, Mireya) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-00493 JWH (SHKx). (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:23-cv-00493 JGB (SHKx). (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, FedEx Freight, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Alberto Mora. (FILED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 2/14/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FedEx Freight, Inc., identifying FedEx Freight Corporation, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware and FedEx Freight Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of FedEx Corporation. (Llaurado, Mireya) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Llaurado, Mireya) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2300771 Receipt No: ACACDC-34986423 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Eslami, #2 Declaration of D. Woods, #3 Exhibit A to Dec of D. Woods, #4 Declaration of M. Llaurado, #5 Exhibit 1 (Summons and Complaint) to Dec of M. Llaurado, #6 Exhibit 2 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Certificate of Counsel, #8 ADR Packet, #9 Exhibit 3 (Defendant's Answer to Complaint) to Dec of M. Llaurado, #10 Exhibit 4 (Notice of Dept. Assignment) to Dec of M. Llaurado, #11 Exhibit 5 (Notice of CMC) to Dec of M. Llaurado, #12 Exhibit 6 (Pltfs Statement of Damages) to Dec of M. Llaurado, #13 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Mireya A R Llaurado added to party FedEx Freight, Inc.(pty:dft))(Llaurado, Mireya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.