Adama Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
| Adama Johnson |
| Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv00524 |
| March 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., (Richardson, Jason) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Nissan North America, Inc's Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc..(Attorney Jason M Richardson added to party Nissan North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Richardson, Jason) |
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adama Johnson, upon Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. served on 3/28/2023, answer due 4/18/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael William Oppenheim on behalf of Plaintiff Adama Johnson (Attorney Michael William Oppenheim added to party Adama Johnson(pty:pla))(Oppenheim, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael H Rosenstein on behalf of Plaintiff Adama Johnson (Attorney Michael H Rosenstein added to party Adama Johnson(pty:pla))(Rosenstein, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Adama Johnson. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adama Johnson, (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adama Johnson. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35020086 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Adama Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - RISC, #2 Exhibit B - Statement of Information, #3 Exhibit C - Corporate Information About Nissan) (Attorney Sepehr Daghighian added to party Adama Johnson(pty:pla))(Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
