Monster Energy Company v. Beast Cookie Company LLC
| MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY, and Monster Energy Company |
| BEAST COOKIE COMPANY, LLC and Beast Cookie Company LLC |
| 5:2023cv00568 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 filed by Defendant Beast Cookie Company LLC. (Harris, Michael) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 filed by Plaintiff Monster Energy Company. (Attorney Paul A. Stewart added to party Monster Energy Company(pty:pla))(Stewart, Paul) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Beast Cookie Company LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/12/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Beast Cookies Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Declaration of Michael Harris in Support of Beast Cookies Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1 to Michael Harris Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Michael Harris Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to Michael Harris Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to Michael Harris Declaration, #7 Proposed Order) (Harris, Michael) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Beast Cookie Company LLC answer now due 5/10/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Beast Cookie Company LLC.(Attorney Michael D. Harris added to party Beast Cookie Company LLC(pty:dft))(Harris, Michael) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Monster Energy Company, upon Defendant Beast Cookie Company LLC served on 4/4/2023, answer due 4/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Rosenbaum, Jacob) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Beast Cookie Company LLC. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (sh) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY,. (Rosenbaum, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY,, identifying Monster Beverage Corporation, Parent of Monster Energy Company; The Coca-Cola Company, Shareholder owning approximately 16.7% of common stock of Monster Beverage Corporation. (Rosenbaum, Jacob) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY,. (Rosenbaum, Jacob) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY,. (Rosenbaum, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35053413 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1-A19) (Attorney Jacob R Rosenbaum added to party MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY,(pty:pla))(Rosenbaum, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
