Lan Xu v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
Lan Xu |
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel |
5:2023cv00578 |
April 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Alka Sagar |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #12 by Judge R. Gary Klausner that the instant action shall be stayed until 5/24/2024. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) See document for further information. (jp) |
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Application filed by Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jill S Casselman added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Jill S Casselman added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Jill S Casselman added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Casselman, Jill) |
Filing 11 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jp) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shasha H. Kewalramani to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:23-cv-00578 RGK(ASx). (rn) (Main Document 10 replaced on 5/25/2023) (rn). |
Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (dc) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lan Xu, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 4/10/2023, answer due 6/9/2023; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 4/10/2023, answer due 6/9/2023; David M. Radel served on 4/10/2023, answer due 6/9/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit delivered confirmation, #2 Exhibit summons)(Wang, Justin) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Lan Xu. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lan Xu, (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lan Xu. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Lan Xu. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35067762 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Lan Xu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Justin X. Wang added to party Lan Xu(pty:pla))(Wang, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.