Marc T. Crain v. Larry P. Crain, Sr. et al
| Marc T. Crain |
| Larry P. Crain, Sr., First Security Bank, Nathan Rutledge and Larry P. Crain, Jr. |
| 5:2023cv00610 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Non Prisoner Case). SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) filed by Plaintiff Marc T. Crain. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Larry P. Crain, Sr, Larry P. Crain, Jr, First Security Bank, Nathan Rutledge. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Filed by Plaintiff Marc T. Crain. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
