Antonio Matas v. Stevens Transport, Inc. et al
| ANTONIO MATAS |
| STEVENS TRANSPORT INC., Stevens Transport, Inc., Marques Lashon Coleman and Does 1 trough 100, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv00700 |
| April 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Sheri Pym |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), ANSWER filed by DEFENDANT Marques Lashon Coleman.(Attorney John D Barrett, Jr added to party Marques Lashon Coleman(pty:dft))(Barrett, John) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (yl) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (ev)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by DEFENDANT Stevens Transport, Inc..(Barrett, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Antonio Matas, (McKibben, Molly) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT Stevens Transport, Inc., identifying STEVENS TRANSPORT INC.. (Barrett, John) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (ev)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-00700 JWH (SPx). (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Marques Lashon Coleman, Does, Stevens Transport, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Antonio Matas. (FILED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/27/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant STEVENS TRANSPORT INC.. (Barrett, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT, case number CIVSB2224817 Receipt No: ACACDC-35175894 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT STEVENS TRANSPORT INC.. (Attorney John D Barrett, Jr added to party STEVENS TRANSPORT INC.(pty:dft))(Barrett, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
