Carol Barker v. James Boos et al
| Carol Barker |
| James Boos and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2023cv00714 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant James Boos. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carol Barker, (Coone, Aksana) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carol Barker. (Coone, Aksana) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carol Barker. (Coone, Aksana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35181478 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Carol Barker. (Attorney Aksana Moshaiv Coone added to party Carol Barker(pty:pla))(Coone, Aksana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
