Herbert Cornejo Mendez v. Jim M. Robertson
Herbert Cornejo Mendez |
Jim M. Robertson |
5:2023cv00734 |
April 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Wesley L Hsu |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . The above case was opened as duplicate case. The case in question is to be administratively closed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-036) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Wesley L. Hsu, this case is transferred from Judge Jesus G. Bernal to the calendar of Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:23-cv-00734-JGB-SHK. (ap) |
Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent) (dc) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). (twdb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Herbert Cornejo Mendez. (ghap) |
Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by petitioner Herbert Cornejo Mendez. (ghap) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Herbert Cornejo Mendez. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Herbert Cornejo Mendez v. Jim M. Robertson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Herbert Cornejo Mendez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Jim M. Robertson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.