Herbert Cornejo Mendez v. Jim M. Robertson
Petitioner: Herbert Cornejo Mendez
Respondent: Jim M. Robertson
Case Number: 5:2023cv00734
Filed: April 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Wesley L Hsu
2 Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . The above case was opened as duplicate case. The case in question is to be administratively closed. (ghap)
May 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-036) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Wesley L. Hsu, this case is transferred from Judge Jesus G. Bernal to the calendar of Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:23-cv-00734-JGB-SHK. (ap)
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent) (dc)
May 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). (twdb)
April 27, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap)
April 21, 2023 Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Herbert Cornejo Mendez. (ghap)
April 21, 2023 Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by petitioner Herbert Cornejo Mendez. (ghap)
April 21, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Herbert Cornejo Mendez. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herbert Cornejo Mendez v. Jim M. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Herbert Cornejo Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jim M. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?