Lauren Garber et al v. Sam Chandra et al
Lauren Garber and Frank Ramirez |
Sam Chandra, Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Trustee Corps and Finance of America Reverse |
5:2023cv00780 |
May 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: denying #3 MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (yl) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Frank Ramirez. (lh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Lauren Garber. (lh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lauren Garber, (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Sam Chandra, Finance of America Reverse, Trustee Corps Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Filed by Plaintiffs Lauren Garber, Frank Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.