Escobar Urrutia et al v. Lazer Spot, Inc. et al
| Ericka Nataly Escobar Urrutia and Rebecca Dawn Stewart |
| Lazer Spot, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv00849 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 23-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:23-cv-00403-JGB-SHKx. Case transferred from Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:23-cv-00849-JGB-SHKx. Signed by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (aco)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.. Related Case(s): 5:23-cv-00403-JGB-SHK (Jackson, Justin) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to State Court re Removal)(Jackson, Justin) |
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-00849 SB (SHKx). (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/11/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Lazer Spot, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Ericka Nataly Escobar Urrutia, Rebecca Dawn Stewart. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/16/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #4 , Declaration #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 served on May 11, 2023. (Afar, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc., identifying 1. Plaintiff Ericka Nataly Escobar Urrutia; 2. Plaintiff Rebecca Dawn Stewart; 3. Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.; 4. Lazer Spot Holdings, Inc.; and 5. EQT Group (EQT Value-Add Infrastructure).. (Afar, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Candice Mirasol re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Afar, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Afar, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2228377 Receipt No: ACACDC-35299122 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Attorney Michael Afar added to party Lazer Spot, Inc.(pty:dft))(Afar, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
