Mark Arnold Paget v. KBR, Inc. et al
| Mark Arnold Paget |
| KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc., Does 1 through 10, business entities, forms unknown, Does 11-20 individuals and Does 21-30 inclusive |
| 5:2023cv00873 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO SUBMIT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS TO BINDING ARBITRATION #14 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims asserted in Plaintiff's Complaint be submitted to binding arbitration, that this Action shall be stayed pending the completion of the arbitration proceedings, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the matter to confirm, correct, or vacate any arbitration award. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (iv)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Binding Arbitration filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wilson, Nikki) |
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: On 5/17/2023, the Court issued an Order Setting Scheduling Conference #12 ("Order"). Pursuant to that Order, the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report (the "Report") was due on or before 6/12/2023, and the Scheduling Conference was set for 6/26/2023 at 11:00 a.m. The required Report has not been filed. The Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference and no appearances shall be made on 6/26/2023. The Court ORDERS the parties to file the required Joint Rule 26(f) Report including a completed worksheet (Exhibit A to the Order) with agreed-upon dates -- no later than 6/30/2023. The Court will then issue pretrial and trial dates. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Scheduling Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (rs)
|
| Filing 11 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-00873 MWF (SPx). (sh) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc., re Declaration, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #6 , Declaration, #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 , Notice (Other) #7 (Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 7 Notice Request for Judicial Notice filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc.. (Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc., (Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc. identifying KBR, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Judith Njomgang re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Njomgang Declaration, #2 Exhibit B to Njomgang Declaration, #3 Exhibit C to Njomgang Declaration, #4 Exhibit D to Njomgang Declaration)(Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Nikki L. Wilson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants KBR Services, LLC, KBR Technical Services, Inc., KBR, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Wilson Declaration - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Wilson Declaration - State Court Summons and POS, #3 Exhibit C to Wilson Declaration - State Court Answer)(Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants KBR Services, LLC, KBR Technical Services, Inc., KBR, Inc.. (Wilson, Nikki) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2228393 Receipt No: ACACDC-35314208 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants KBR Technical Services, Inc., KBR Services, LLC, KBR, Inc.. (Attorney Nikki L Wilson added to party KBR Services, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Nikki L Wilson added to party KBR Technical Services, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Nikki L Wilson added to party KBR, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wilson, Nikki) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Does, Does, KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Mark Arnold Paget.[FILED IN STATE COURT 12/16/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE DECLARATION OF NIKKI L. WILSON #3 ] (sh) |
| NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants KBR Inc., KBR Services LLC, KBR Technical Services Inc. [STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBIT C TO THE DECLARATION OF NIKKI L. WILSON #3 ](sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
