Hongliang Wang v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| HONGLIANG WANG |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office, David Radel, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M JADDOU, Ted H. Kim, MATTHEW D EMRICH, Christopher A Wray, Does One through Ten, inclusive, Ur M. Jaddou, Matthew D. Emrich, Christopher A. Wray and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2023cv00889 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| John F Walter |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Oil Appellate counsel for Defendants Does, Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher A. Wray. Adding Ernesto H. Molina as counsel of record for DHS et al for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants DHS et al. (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Does(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Matthew D. Emrich(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ted H. Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party David Radel(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party United States Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Christopher A. Wray(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 5/23/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant Christopher A. Wray served on 5/25/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant Ted H. Kim served on 5/23/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant Matthew D. Emrich served on 5/24/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/24/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 5/24/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant David Radel served on 5/24/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office served on 5/23/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hongliang Wang, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/24/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 05/25/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher A. Wray. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff HONGLIANG WANG. (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff HONGLIANG WANG, (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff HONGLIANG WANG. (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35332111 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff HONGLIANG WANG. (Attorney Gihan L Thomas added to party HONGLIANG WANG(pty:pla))(Thomas, Gihan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
