Elysha Castillo v. The Scion Group LLC et al
| Elysha Castillo |
| The Scion Group LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv00957 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TOCOMPLAINT #9 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for August 3, 2023. The court hereby GRANTS the Motion. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint no later than August 2, 2023. (lc)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 8/3/2023 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant The Scion Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Terepka, Alexander) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Scion Group LLC answer now due 7/3/2023, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Scion Group LLC.(Terepka, Alexander) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-Ccv-00957 FLA (PVCx). (sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elysha Castillo, upon Defendant The Scion Group LLC served on 4/27/2023. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy [FILED IN STATE COURT 05/02/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 5 EXHIBIT E TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, The Scion Group LLC.jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Elysha Castillo. [FILED IN STATE COURT 04/24/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) Modified on 5/31/2023 (sh). |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant The Scion Group LLC identifying Scion Group Management, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Terepka, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Scion Group LLC. (Terepka, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County, California, case number CVRI2302060 Receipt No: ACACDC-35384539 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant The Scion Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit Certificate of Counsel, #5 Exhibit Proof of Service of Summons, #6 Exhibit Notice of Case Management Conference, #7 Exhibit Notice of Department Assignment, #8 Declaration of Rachelle Brady, #9 Declaration Alexander Terepka) (Attorney Alexander D Terepka added to party The Scion Group LLC(pty:dft))(Terepka, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
