Derrick Deon Horton v. Riverside County
| Derrick Deon Horton |
| Riverside County |
| 5:2023cv00984 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| George H Wu |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es) |
Filing 7
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (HABEAS) by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because in screening the Petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, the Court finds that it plainly appears that Petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court. As explained in the attached statement, because it plainly appears that Petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.; denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.). (aco)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order #3 . Document # 3 Motion to Reopen Case should have been filed under case numbers 5:22-cv-1213 GW-JPR and 5:22-cv-2253 GW-JPR. The motion will be stricken from this case and filed on the two corresponding cases. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO REOPEN CASE filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(Filing fee $ 5:FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Derrick Deon Horton v. Riverside County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Derrick Deon Horton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Riverside County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
