Avag Topachikyan v. Luis Martinez
| Avag Topachikyan |
| Luis Martinez |
| 5:2023cv01049 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Alka Sagar |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Directing Respondent To File A Response To Petitioner's Opposition To Motion To Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re: MOTION to Dismiss #11 . Within 14 days of the date of this Order - by no later than August 8, 2023 - Respondent is ORDERED to file a response to Petitioner's opposition to the motion to dismiss. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE - Counsel has failed to provide courtesy copies re Notice of Lodging #12 , #13 and #14 , which were filed on July 21, 2023. Pursuant to the Judge's Procedures and Schedules (http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-alka-sagar), counsel is ordered to submit the required courtesy copy by no later than 12:00 p.m. on July 26, 2023. Failure to deliver timely mandatory chambers copies may result in a delay in hearing a motion or ordering the matter off calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (afe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 17 Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #11 filed by Petitioner Avag Topachikyan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Minute Order of October 21, 2022)(Kaiserman, Brad) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Directing Petitioner To File An Opposition To Motion To Dismiss #11 Or Statement Of Non-Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Within thirty days of the date of this Order by no later than August 23, 2023 Petitioner is ORDERED to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss. (afe)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Oversized Lodgment #13 , Oversized Lodgment #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect; Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Notice of Lodging. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
| Filing 14 Oversized Lodgment 13 Part 2 filed by Respondent Luis Martinez re: Miscellaneous Document #13 , Notice of Lodging,, #12 (Chenelia, Kristen) |
| Filing 13 Oversized Lodgment 13 (Part 1) re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #11 , Notice of Lodging,, #12 (Chenelia, Kristen) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #11 (Attachments: #1 Lodgment No. 1, #2 Lodgment No. 2, #3 Lodgment No. 3, #4 Lodgment No. 4, #5 Lodgment No. 5, #6 Lodgment No. 6, #7 Lodgment No. 7, #8 Lodgment No. 8, #9 Lodgment No. 9, #10 Lodgment No. 10, #11 Lodgment No. 11, #12 Lodgment No. 12, #13 Lodgment No. 14, #14 Lodgment No. 15, #15 Lodgment No. 16, #16 Lodgment No. 17, #17 Lodgment No. 18, #18 Lodgment No. 19, #19 Lodgment No. 20)(Chenelia, Kristen) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Luis Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum) (Chenelia, Kristen) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia on behalf of Respondent Luis Martinez (Attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia added to party Luis Martinez(pty:res))(Chenelia, Kristen) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. IT IS ORDERED that: On or before July 5, 2023, Respondent shall file and serve a Notice of Appearance. If Respondent contends that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioner's claims, Respondent shall file a Motion to Dismiss on or before July 20, 2023. If Respondent does not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioner's claims, Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to the Petition on or before August 21, 2023. (see document for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Petitioner's Non-Consent) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Alka Sagar. New Case Number 5:23-cv-01049-WLH (AS). (et) |
| Filing 6 Amended (Corrected) CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Avag Topachikyan, (Kaiserman, Brad) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Avag Topachikyan, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Civil Cover Sheet; Notice of Interested Parties; Election Not to Proceed with Magistrate served on June 2, 2023. (Kaiserman, Brad) |
| Filing 4 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c. (Kaiserman, Brad) |
| Filing 3 Petitioner's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Avag Topachikyan, (Kaiserman, Brad) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Avag Topachikyan. (Kaiserman, Brad) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. ACACDC-35423125 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Avag Topachikyan. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum) (Attorney Brad Kannof Kaiserman added to party Avag Topachikyan(pty:pet))(Kaiserman, Brad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Avag Topachikyan v. Luis Martinez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Avag Topachikyan | |
| Represented By: | Brad Kannof Kaiserman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Luis Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
