Michael Davis v. Sunnova Energy Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Defendant: Sunnova Energy Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2023cv01052
Filed: June 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: The Court has reviewed the parties' Stipulation [ECF No. 17], and it is hereby APPROVED. Defendant Sunnova's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due on or by August 17, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 25, 2023 Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sunnova Energy Corporation answer now due 8/17/2023, filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS)(Rillo, Christopher)
July 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) by Judge John W. Holcomb. The stipulated two-week extension of time for the Defendant Sunnova to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is APPROVED. 2. Defendant Sunnova's response to Plaintiffs Complaint is to be filed on or by July 27, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
July 7, 2023 Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sunnova Energy Corporation answer now due 7/27/2023, filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS)(Rillo, Christopher)
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Text Only ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel David to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation #13 by Judge John W. Holcomb. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 15, 2023 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel David to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35500057) filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Attorney Theodore W. Chandler added to party Sunnova Energy Corporation(pty:dft)) (Chandler, Theodore)
June 14, 2023 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Michael Davis (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Treglio, James)
June 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla)
June 12, 2023 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sunnova Energy Corporation answer now due 7/13/2023, filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation.(Rillo, Christopher)
June 9, 2023 Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation. (Rillo, Christopher)
June 9, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment # 2 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. (et)
June 9, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Danny David on behalf of Defendant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
June 9, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
June 9, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
June 9, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01052-JWH (SPx). (et)
June 7, 2023 Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on June 6, 2023. (Rillo, Christopher)
June 6, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Sunnova Energy Corporation, Does 1 to 100, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Michael Davis. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/25/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et)
June 6, 2023 Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation, identifying Sunnova Energy International Inc.. (Rillo, Christopher)
June 6, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation's Petition for Removal Receipt No: ACACDC-35442664 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sunnova Energy Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Christopher J Rillo added to party Sunnova Energy Corporation(pty:dft))(Rillo, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Davis v. Sunnova Energy Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Represented By: James M Treglio
Represented By: Mark D Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunnova Energy Corporation
Represented By: Christopher J Rillo
Represented By: Christina Anne Romak
Represented By: Raerani Reddy
Represented By: Daniel David
Represented By: Theodore W. Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?