Armando Mata et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Armando Mata and Natalia Mata |
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2023cv01185 |
June 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Rozella A Oliver |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY in Support of Motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #8 filed by Plaintiffs Armando Mata, Natalia Mata. (Pakbaz, Camran) |
Filing 10 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #8 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (McClendon, Nykeemah) |
Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court continues the Motion to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #8 to 12/07/2023 at 10:00 AM. Counsel shall take notice of this new date. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs Armando Mata, Natalia Mata. Motion set for hearing on 11/2/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Camran Pakbaz, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Proposed Order) (Attorney Camran Kyle Pakbaz added to party Armando Mata(pty:pla), Attorney Camran Kyle Pakbaz added to party Natalia Mata(pty:pla)) (Pakbaz, Camran) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01185 MEMF (RAOx). (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Filed in State Court on 5/12/2023 Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Armando Mata, Natalia Mata. Filed in State Court on 1/17/2023 Submitted with Attachment Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on June 20, 2023. (Maclear, Amy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Maclear, Amy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Maclear, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County, case number CIVSB2302714 Receipt No: BCACDC-35523053 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy Maclear, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Attorney Amy Patricia Maclear added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Maclear, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.