Raul Uriarte-Limon v. VKLJ Lian, LLC et al
| Raul Uriarte-Limon |
| VKLJ LIAN, LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2023cv01200 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT VKLJ LIAN, LLC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT TO SEPTEMBER 15, 2023 #17 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 17 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 09/15/2023 filed by Attorney for Defendant VKLJ Lian, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reeves, Rex) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim and dismisses that cause of action. As this action is now limited to Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief under the ADA, any trial in this action shall be tried by the court rather than by jury. (lc) Modified on 7/24/2023 (lc).
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to VKLJ Lian, LLC answer now due 8/18/2023, filed by Attorney for Defendant VKLJ Lian, LLC.(Attorney Rex T Reeves added to party VKLJ Lian, LLC(pty:dft))(Reeves, Rex) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, upon Defendant VKLJ Lian, LLC served on 6/28/2023, answer due 7/19/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kim Dung Nguyen - Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limonto Order to Show Cause #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Proof of Service)(Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/10/2023. (tf)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant VKLJ Lian, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35531302 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Attorney Matt D Valenti added to party Raul Uriarte-Limon(pty:pla))(Valenti, Matt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
