Alan Bronshteyn v. McLaren Automotive, Inc. et al
| Alan Bronshteyn |
| McLaren Automotive, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, Inclusive |
| 5:2023cv01201 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. Jury Trial set for 6/11/2024 at 9:00 AM; Pretrial Conference set for 5/24/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See order for dates, deadlines and requirements imposed.* (vdr)
|
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Alan Bronshteyn.. (Barry, David) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/27/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01201 FMO (MAAx). (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc. Filed in State Court on 6/21/2023 Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-20, inclusive, McLaren Automotive, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Alan Bronshteyn. Filed in State Court on 5/15/2023 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Alan Bronshteyn, identifying McLaren Group. (Villegas, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by defendant Alan Bronshteyn.. (Villegas, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alan Bronshteyn. (Villegas, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Riverside, case number CVPS2302368 Receipt No: ACACDC-35532251 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Alan Bronshteyn. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel R. Villegas, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proof of Service) (Attorney Daniel R Villegas added to party Alan Bronshteyn(pty:pla))(Villegas, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
