Hoang Minh Le v. Memons Three, LLC
Hoang Minh Le |
MEMONS THREE, LLC, a limited liability company and Memons Three, LLC |
5:2023cv01356 |
July 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Attorney for Defendant Memons Three, LLC. upon Memons Three, LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/9/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Dan T. Danet, Esq.. (Danet, Dan) |
Filing 13 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (See document for further details). (aco) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Hoang Minh Leto Order to Show Cause,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Pamela Tsao, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Pamela Tsao, #3 Declaration Declaration of Hoang Minh Le, #4 Exhibit A to Declaration of Hoang Minh Le)(Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. Both the Court and the attorneys bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in the Federal Courts. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) |
Filing 10 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than July 28, 2023. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (rolm) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Memons Three, LLC. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hoang Minh Le, (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Hoang Minh Le. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hoang Minh Le. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35656105 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Hoang Minh Le. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Photos) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party Hoang Minh Le(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.