Hamilton Lopez Rosales v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Hamilton Lopez Rosales |
| SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, MERRICK GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou |
| 5:2023cv01445 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas.(Attorney Adam Gafni added to party Merrick Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Adam Gafni added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Adam Gafni added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft))(Gafni, Adam) |
Filing 12
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. Other error(s) with document(s): The case number is missing from the document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying None known at this time.. (Brown, Meredith) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Merrick Garland. (et) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (et) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Hamilton Lopez Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons Jaddous, #2 Supplement Summons Garland)(Brown, Meredith) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hamilton Lopez Rosales. (Brown, Meredith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35723866 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Hamilton Lopez Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NACARA 2018 Filing, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Declaration, #3 Exhibit Communications with USCIS / DHS) (Attorney Meredith Riley Brown added to party Hamilton Lopez Rosales(pty:pla))(Brown, Meredith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
