Maersk AS v. Four Seasons Apparel USA, Inc. et al
| Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas and Maersk AS |
| Four Seasons Apparel USA, Inc. aka Four Seasons Apparel, Inc. aka Four Seasons Apparel, Inc., Ali Safawi, Four Seasons Apparel USA, Inc. and Four Seasons Apparel, Inc. |
| 5:2023cv01446 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Four Seasons Apparel USA, Inc. aka Four Seasons Apparel, Inc., Ali Safawi (bm) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendants All Defendants filed by Plaintiff Maersk AS. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen M Uthoff) (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maersk AS, upon Defendant Ali Safawi served on 8/15/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ester Lomeli, Receptionist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maersk AS, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ammar Altimimi, manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maersk AS, upon Defendant Four Seasons Apparel USA, Inc. served on 8/14/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ammar Altimimi, manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Uthoff, Stephen) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ali Safawi. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Four Seasons Apparel USA, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas. (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas. (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas, identifying Maers A/S. (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas. (Uthoff, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35724521 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas. (Attorney Stephen M Uthoff added to party Maersk A/S trading as Sealand Americas(pty:pla))(Uthoff, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
