Latanya Williams v. Juanitas Fast Casual Inc et al
| Latanya Williams |
| Juanitas Fast Casual Inc and Does 1 to 10 |
| 5:2023cv01467 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
IN CHAMBERS ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS CALIFORNIA STATE LAW CLAIMS [DKT. 12] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, and Williams Unruh Civil Rights Act, Californias Disabled Persons Act, California Health & Safety Code, and state negligence claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
|
Filing 12
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") by Judge Sunshine S. Sykes: The Court has received Plaintiff's Response (the "Response") to the Court's OSC issued on July 31, 2023, [Dkt. 10]. In view of the Response, the Court hereby VACATES the OSC hearing set for August 18, 2023. A separate order addressing the matter of supplemental jurisdiction will be issued. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Latanya Williamsto Order to Show Cause,,,, #9 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DENY SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Williams shall identify the statutory damages she seeks to recover. Williams and her counsel shall also support their responses to this Order with declarations, signed under penalty of perjury, providing all facts necessary for the Court to determine if they satisfy the definition of a high-frequency litigant as provided by California Civil Procedure Code 425.55(b)(1) & (2). Williams shall file her response to this order no later than August 11, 2023. The Court further sets a hearing regarding this Order to Show Cause on August 18, 2023, at 1:00 PM via Zoom.1 Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Juanitas Fast Casual Inc. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Latanya Williams. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Latanya Williams. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35743673 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Latanya Williams(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
