Jose Ramirez v. Rialto Police Department et al
| Jose Ramirez |
| Rialto Police Department, City of Rialto, Ralph Ballew and Does 1 through 10, individually |
| 5:2023cv01491 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ralph Ballew, City of Rialto, Rialto Police Department. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jose Ramirez. (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Ramirez, (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Ramirez. (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35757764 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jose Ramirez. (Attorney Christian M. Contreras added to party Jose Ramirez(pty:pla))(Contreras, Christian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
