Elizabeth Ramos Herrera v. LBS Financial Credit Union et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ramos Herrera
Defendant: LBS Financial Credit Union and Equifax Information Services LLC
Case Number: 5:2023cv01537
Filed: August 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION GRANTING LBS FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION ATHIRTY DAY EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT **Changes made by Court is underlined.** by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #6 (dc)
September 14, 2023 Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to LBS Financial Credit Union answer now due 10/16/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant LBS Financial Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order In Support Of Stipulation Granting LBS Financial Credit Union A Thirty Day Extension To File Response To Plaintiffs Complaint)(Attorney Vanessa H. Widener added to party LBS Financial Credit Union(pty:dft))(Widener, Vanessa)
August 3, 2023 Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Equifax Information Services LLC, LBS Financial Credit Union. (sh)
August 3, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh)
August 2, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Ramos Herrera. (Ovruchesky, Clark)
August 2, 2023 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Ramos Herrera, (Ovruchesky, Clark)
August 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35785514 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Ramos Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Clark Ovruchesky added to party Elizabeth Ramos Herrera(pty:pla))(Ovruchesky, Clark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elizabeth Ramos Herrera v. LBS Financial Credit Union et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ramos Herrera
Represented By: Clark Ovruchesky
Represented By: George Costa Panagiotou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LBS Financial Credit Union
Represented By: Jonathan Matthew Beltram
Represented By: Vanessa H. Widener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?