Attitude Adjustment Inc. et al v. Gatunlati Co, Inc. et al
| ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT, INC., STEPHAN BROWN and Attitude Adjustment Inc. |
| GATUNLATI CO, INC., AMANDA BLOOM, Gatunlati Co Inc. and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 5:2023cv01563 |
| August 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 OBJECTIONS to Order,, Terminated Case, #13 PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE CORMAC J. CORNEYS ORDER DATED AUGUST 10, 2023 SUA SPONTE CLOSING THE CASE A SECOND-TIME PREJUDICIALLY filed by Plaintiffs Attitude Adjustment Inc., Stephan Brown. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Attitude Adjustment Inc., Stephan Brown. (Kamath, Reshma) |
Filing 13
ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs refiling this case in state court. (see document for further information) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. (identical case) by Judge Percy Anderson, Case Management and Assignment Committee Chair. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. All discovery matters are transferred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Case number now reads as 5:23-cv-01563 CJC(ADSx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by PLAINTIFFS Attitude Adjustment Inc., Stephan Brown. upon Amanda Bloom waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/9/2023, answer due 10/10/2023; Gatunlati Co Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/9/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Michael V. Mancini. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Gatunlati Co Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Amanda Bloom. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Summons Request #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by PLAINTIFFS ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT, INC., STEPHAN BROWN. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT, INC., STEPHAN BROWN. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by PLAINTIFFS ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT, INC., STEPHAN BROWN. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 06/12/2023, receipt number BCACDC-35481290), filed by PLAINTIFFS ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT, INC., STEPHAN BROWN. (Attorney Reshma Kamath added to party ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT, INC.(pty:pla), Attorney Reshma Kamath added to party STEPHAN BROWN(pty:pla))(Kamath, Reshma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
